Brief Background
|
Encontros Bibli Journal (EB) was created in the scope of the Department of Information Science of the Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), with its first issue published in May 1996. Since its creation by Professor Francisco Chagas de Souza, several professors have integrated the Editorial Council, which is composed of professors both from the Department of Information Science of UFSC (CIN) and other universities that took responsibility for the project. According to Souza (2008, p. 145), the creator and director of the project, "[...] Initially, the idea was to address issues related to library education”. Nonetheless, the development of the scientific journal, as the main formal communication means in the research scope, was fostered as the areas of Library Science, Archival Science, and Information Science (CI) gained more space in Brazil. The electronic publication of manuscripts since the first issue allows us to evaluate the changes of focus topics throughout the Encontros Bibli Journal history. In the decade 1990, as intended the initial EB proposal, publications on the professional training of Library Science and IS were the most frequent, including curriculum, the teaching of topics linked to disciplines, as well as creation and recognition of courses both in the country and abroad. Starting in 2000, the scientific perspectives of the publications have enlarged and consolidated, with significantly more articles per issue and studies of several topics, encompassing Information Science, Library Science, Archival Science, Museology, and related areas. Since 2003, the journal has been managed by the Graduate Program in Information Science (PGCIN/UFSC) at the same university, promoting and disseminating knowledge and strategically and operationally stimulating and supporting the development of the Encontros Bibli Journal. With a semi-annual publication frequency since its release, in 2007 EB transitioned from a local webpage to an Open Journal System, favoring its institutionalization process in the UFSC in 2008, through the release of the UFSC Portal of Journals. Starting in 2012, the publication frequency becomes quarterly. With increasing visibility both in the country and abroad, the several editorial teams that constitute the journal have overseen practices for improving the quality of the journal and access to scientific information. For this reason, and especially upon its institutionalization, the EB team has offered editorial support to several journals in the UFSC by sharing the management of the UFSC Journal Portal. In 2019, EB starts projects of publication modernization by adopting the research workflow of continuous publication of articles, focusing on publishing decisions and research data, always seeking to align with good national and international practices for actions and movements of Open Science. Since November 2019, our articles have been indexed in the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) of the Web of Science, property of Clarivate Analytics, the former Thomson Reuters, a database of world scientific relevance. In the same year, EB became part of the Redalyc, a bibliographic database and of digital library of open-access journals, supported by the Autonomous University do Mexico State. In 2021, Encontros Bibli Journal is indexed by the SciVerse Scopus, a database of abstracts and citations of articles for academic journals, covering around 19.5 thousand titles from over 5,000 international publishing houses, with 16,500 peer-reviewed journals of the scientific, technical, medical, and social sciences fields. |
Open Science Compliance
|
1. Scientific Nature
Since its creation, Encontros Bibli Journal has been strongly dedicated to research dissemination and publicity in the areas of Information Science – Library Science, Archival Science, Museology, Information Management, Communication – and other related areas, by adopting practices that allow maximizing and streamlining the editorial process of the articles that are published on our platform. Our journal has become a space of inclusion and diversity that works for the acceptance of affirmative actions and fosters wide debates by offering informative materials, promoting events on gender equality, and supporting any action that stimulates collaboration. Encontros Bibli provides public access to its entire content based on the principle that allowing free access to research generates a greater global knowledge exchange. Focusing on streamlining the processes of research publicity and dissemination on our focus areas, the journal uses the publication system of continuous workflow. Our view focuses on fostering the practices of the Science Open movement for better research transparency and reproducibility by sharing research data openly, thus favoring collaboration in the scientific community. The editorial team of Encontros Bibli Journal:
Encontros Bibli Journal seeks to create a space for authors, readers, evaluators, and the whole community interested in deepening knowledge in the areas of Information and Communication to collaborate and contribute to science development. A space for research data, laboratory notes, and other research processes to be available openly, supported by policies that allow the reuse, redistribution, and reproduction of research data and methods employed.
2. Relevance and Operational Sustainability
Elements of economic, social, and cultural development are extremely relevant to understanding the main discussions of the contemporary world. The Encontros Bibli editorial, publications, and actions on social networks seek to address the relevance of debating culture as an economic development tool that fosters social transformation. Likewise, we understand economic development as a key to improving the population's quality of life and fostering culture and social balance in our society. We promote lectures and debates in the main events in the country and abroad concerning information treatment and its impacts on the life of society. We have been working on a project aimed at making the population increasingly familiar with the results and research published in their environments. All resources and efforts of Encontros Bibli Journal seek to drive the economy, culture, and innovative thought of our readers and users aiming to foster independence and autonomy. Nonetheless, we also seek cultural investments linked to social and educational purposes with clearly delimited assignments and roles of sociocultural policies in both public and private scopes. The journal is administratively subscribed to the Graduate Program in Information Science of the Federal University of Santa Catarina (PGCIN-UFSC) and the UFSC Portal of Journals. Both institutions guarantee the operational and financial sustainability of the journal. On the one hand, the PGCIN guarantees a sustainable professional editorial team that is skillful and knowledgeable to assume alternately and responsibly the direction of the journal, in addition to affording the cost of XML markup services (Extensible Markup Language). On the other hand, the UFSC Portal of Journals, responsible for providing access, visibility, safety, and support to the editors of its scientific journals, guarantees the resources for the payment of services, such as the availability of DOI (Digital Object Identification) for the articles and proof of plagiarism service using the Ithenticate tool for detecting similarity of characters.
3. Editorial Qualification
The members of the Encontros Bibli Journal editorial team are known for their contribution and expertise in the academic community. Our journal dedicates to preserving a satisfactory representativeness of the foreign community in the editorial team while taking actions aimed at a balanced formation of a more inclusive and diverse research team, especially concerning gender equality. Consult our Editorial Team here
4. Free Access
5. Filing
|
Ethics in Publication
|
Ethics and good publication practices
Our editorial practice and the relationship between editors and authors and evaluators follow the Guidelines for editors defined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). All editorial decisions are grounded on originality, contribution, pertinence, thematic relevance, general structure, and compliance with editorial policies to meet the scope of the journal.
Our evaluation is based on the research merit and is not influenced, either positively or negatively, by any personal, financial, or biased reasons. The editorial process of Encontros Bibli provides a double-blind anonymously evaluation (double-blind peer review). All submissions and details of the reviews are kept under confidentiality. Encontros Bibli publishes the decision issued by the evaluator anonymously along with the article. The evaluator must ensure and inform the editors of any potential conflict of interest before accepting the evaluation or throughout the process. Upon detecting any irregularities in the evaluated article, the evaluator must inform the editor. Examples of potential irregularities are the identification of plagiarism, manipulation and/or falsification of results, and redundant publication. Decisions that have not been sufficiently justified will not be accepted.
The authorship of a scientific article must be indicated following the Guidelines for authors by the COPE (English). The author(es) must declare the existence of a conflict of interests by filling in the proper field available on the Work Notes template that will be sent as a supplementary document, in addition to the corresponding field in the system when submitting the manuscript.
Retraction and expression of concern The editor must act upon identifying any suspicion or allegation of misconduct. The investigation will cover both submissions and published articles. Encontros Bibli uses the COPE flowcharts instrument to ascertain facts and determine actions required for the resolution of cases, in addition to the Guidelines for registering and publication of retraction by SciELO.
Articles presented in scientific events Encontros Bibli does not accept articles that had been fully presented at scientific events. Only those papers not presented in full, such as "short papers" or abstracts, will be accepted whenever the research has been reworked, expanded, and significantly changed since this new text is then considered unpublished, thus being suitable for acceptance for evaluation. The authors must specify the event (name and link to the site) where the paper was presented during the article submission process in the field “Comments to the editor” in the system.
Conflicts of Interest Conflicts of interest can be personal, commercial, policy, academic, or financial and emerge when authors, reviewers, or editors have interests that might influence the elaboration or evaluation of manuscripts. Upon submitting the manuscript, the authors are responsible for acknowledging and disclosing any financial conflicts or any other nature that might have influenced the research. Upon any conflict of interest, although potential, the author(s) must inform through a specific document signed and annexed to the submission platform. The process of evaluating a manuscript involves both authors and reviewers and the editorship of Encontros Bibli Journal has a strict policy to avoid any personal relationships, of either friendship or hostility, as well as to compromise both people and institutions. This procedure aims at the reliability of the analysis process of the submitted material, thus enhancing the credibility of the published articles. Thereby, we instruct the authors and reviewers to contact the Editorial Council of the Journal in cases of a) personal or institutional bonds and conflicts (of a family or partisan nature) between reviewers and authors and b) any financial support for the research development that might jeopardize the reliability of the produced material.
Peer review The editorial process of Encontros Bibli adopts the double-blind anonymously evaluation (double-blind peer review). All originals are pre-evaluated by the editors considering their originality, contribution, pertinence, thematic validity, general structure, and compliance with editorial policies. If these criteria are not met, the authors will be informed within 15 days of the rejection and termination of the article. Upon a positive evaluation, the approved manuscript will be referred to two external referees who will be responsible for the analysis, approval (with or without changes), or rejection of the manuscript within 30 days. If needed, the editors might request the participation of other evaluators. The editor responsible for the manuscript evaluation process will inform the author of the “Acceptance without changes,” “Acceptance with small adjustments,” “Required corrections” (and another referees’ analysis round), or “Rejection” and termination. In the cases of “Acceptance with small adjustments” and “Required corrections” (and another round of referees’ analysis), the author will have 30 days to send the reviewed manuscript to Encontros Bibli, along with a document commenting on the changes. The editor responsible for the manuscript evaluation process will send the evaluators an updated version of the manuscript and the document containing the comments and/or justifications to check whether the reviewed text met the referees’ requirements, and then establish if it can be accepted, or rejected, or still requires changes. If the final decision is to reject the manuscript, the author will be informed of the reason for the rejection and the manuscript will be terminated. If the text requires only grammar, spelling, and normative changes for publication homogeneity, the editors are entitled to perform such changes, respecting the author’s style. In other cases, the author will redraw the text according to the requests of the journal. The editors are entitled to reject works whose content is significantly like other works in any part of the process (plagiarism), identified by the Ithenticate software of plagiarism detection. The average response time between the acceptance of the original and the publication confirmation is approximately 150 days.
Privacy Statement All names and addresses informed to this journal will be used exclusively for the services rendered in the scope of this publication and cannot be provided for any other purposes or third parties, according to LAW Nº 13.709, AUGUST 14, 2018, General Data Protection LAW – LGPD, Articles 3 and 23. |
Focus and Scope
|
Encontros Bibli Journal publishes studies in the field of Information Science – Library Science, Documenting, Archival Science, Museology, Information Management – and related areas resulting from scientific research, theoretical essays, and case studies.
MISSION To contribute to the dissemination and promotion of new knowledge in Information Science, Library Science, Archival Science, Museology, and related areas.
PERIODICITY Encontros Bibli has been published in the modality of continuous publication or continuous workflow from volume 24, 2019.
Adress
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina -- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação
Telephone (48) 3721-2237
encontrosbibli@contato.ufsc.br
INDICATORS
Scimago Journal & Country Rank
Library and Information Sciences (Q4)
Journal Citation Indicator (JCI)
Information Science & Library Science (Q4) |
Digital Preservation
|
Encontros Bibli concerns access to content within the established deadline. Upon the cancellation of any of the servers, our digital files are preserved on the Cariniana Network through the LOCKSS program, which creates a file system distributed among the participating libraries, allowing them to create permanent files for conservation and restoration. |
Indexing Sources
|
One of the main objectives of Encontros Bibli Journal is to influence the debate on research topics and lines developed in the areas of Information Science – Library Science, Archival Science, Museology, and related areas. In this sense, the members of the Editorial Team, along with the Scientific Editorial Council, have focused on greater visibility among the scientific community.
In this perspective, the editorial team has been dedicated to inserting the journal into different spaces of consultation, search, and retrieval of information accessed by the scientific community in the areas of Communication and Information DATA BASE
Emerging Sources Citation index (ESCI)
DIRECTORY
DOAJ
INDEX
PORTALS
Oasisbr
In other systems, such as repositories, social and academic networks, catalogs, and virtual libraries, among others, Encontros Bibli is present in the following publicity channels:
CATALOGUE
b-on - Biblioteca do Conhecimento Online
VIRTUAL LIBRARIES, REPOSITORYS AND OTHERS
Despite all efforts to better position the journal, the editorial team understands the several issues yet to be solved. Nonetheless, the editorial team keeps working to increase the publicity, exposition, and impact of the manuscripts published in the journal. For such a purpose, we created profiles on different social networks. |
Bibliographic Sheet
|
Journal title: Encontros Bibli Short title: Encontros Bibli Published by: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Departamento de Ciências da Informação Frequency: Anual Publication modality: Publicação Contínua Year of creation of the journal: 1996 |
Websites and Social Media
|
Youtube |
Editorial Policy
|
Preprints Aligned with the Open Science movement, our journal supports the use of preprint servers and accepts manuscripts previously stored on reliable servers, such as SciELO Preprints. We support the use of storage repositories for data conservation, dissemination, and reuse, such as SciELO Data. In both cases, the journal must be informed on the storage of preprint and/or data in the repository during the submission process. |
Peer Review Process
|
The editorial process of Encontros Bibli adopts the double-blind anonymously evaluation (double-blind peer review). However, authors and reviewers will be offered options to open the peer review process, with or without identifying their names. Authorization for disclosing the name may be given by the authors at the time of submission of the article and by the evaluators when completing the Evaluation Form. All originals are pre-evaluated by the editors considering their originality, contribution, pertinence, thematic validity, general structure, and compliance with editorial policies. If these criteria are not met, the authors will be informed within 15 days of the rejection and termination of the article. Upon a positive evaluation, the approved manuscript will be referred to two external referees who will be responsible for the analysis, approval (with or without changes), or rejection of the manuscript within 30 days. If needed, the editors might request the participation of other evaluators. The editor responsible for the manuscript evaluation process will inform the author of the “Acceptance without changes,” “Acceptance with small adjustments,” “Required corrections” (and another referees’ analysis round), or “Rejection” and termination. In the cases of “Acceptance with small adjustments” and “Required corrections” (and another round of referees’ analysis), the author will have 30 days to send the reviewed manuscript to Encontros Bibli, along with a document commenting on the changes. The editor responsible for the manuscript evaluation process will send the evaluators an updated version of the manuscript and the document containing the comments and/or justifications to check whether the reviewed text met the referees’ requirements, and then establish if it can be accepted, or rejected, or still requires changes. If the final decision is to reject the manuscript, the author will be informed of the reason for the rejection and the manuscript will be terminated. If the text requires only grammar, spelling, and normative changes for publication homogeneity, the editors are entitled to perform such changes, respecting the author’s style. In other cases, the author will redraw the text according to the requests of the journal. The editors are entitled to reject works whose content is significantly like other works in any part of the process (plagiarism), identified by the Ithenticate software of plagiarism detection. The average response time between the acceptance of the original and the publication confirmation is approximately 150 days. |
Open Data
|
Data are scientific records that validate research results. Research data vary according to the knowledge area and encompass textual documents, spreadsheets, statistics, laboratory reports, field reports, journals, questionnaires, transcriptions, audio and video files, photographs, methodologies, research workflows, partial reports, and other materials elaborated and/or collected throughout the research. All data are supported by the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) principles. Encontros Bibli Journal instructs that all research data and codes are shared and published on a reliable repository. Therefore, we strongly recommended that all data be stored on SciELO Data upon the approval of the manuscripts based on the Guidelines for research data storage. In case the data are hosted in a public repository, it must be indicated on the article by the repository name, data identification number, direct URL to the data, and DOI. |
Collection of Fees
|
Encontros Bibli charges no fees for the submission or processing of articles (APCs). |
Ethics and Misconduct, Correction and Retraction Policy
|
The editor must act upon identifying any suspicion or allegation of misconduct. The investigation will cover both submissions and published articles. Encontros Bibli uses the COPE flowcharts instrument to ascertain facts and determine actions required for the resolution of cases, in addition to the Guidelines for registering and publication of retraction by SciELO. |
Policy on Conflict of Interest
|
Conflicts of interest can be personal, commercial, policy, academic, or financial and emerge when authors, reviewers, or editors have interests that might influence the elaboration or evaluation of manuscripts. Upon submitting the manuscript, the authors are responsible for acknowledging and disclosing any financial conflicts or any other nature that might have influenced the research. Upon any conflict of interest, although potential, the author(s) must inform through a specific document signed and annexed to the submission platform. The process of evaluating a manuscript involves both authors and reviewers and the editorship of Encontros Bibli Journal has a strict policy to avoid any personal relationships, of either friendship or hostility, as well as to compromise both people and institutions. This procedure aims at the reliability of the analysis process of the submitted material, thus enhancing the credibility of the published articles. Thereby, we instruct the authors and reviewers to contact the Editorial Council of the Journal in cases of a) personal or institutional bonds and conflicts (of a family or partisan nature) between reviewers and authors and b) any financial support for the research development that might jeopardize the reliability of the produced material. If there is, even potentially, a conflict of interest, the author(s) must inform it in a signed document attached to the submission platform. For more information see: Disclosure of Financial and Non-Financial Relationships and Activities, and Conflicts of Interest.
Adoption of similarity software The editors are entitled to reject works whose content is significantly like other works in any part of the process (plagiarism), identified by the Ithenticate software of plagiarism detection.
Gender and Sex Issues The editorial team of Encontros Bibli, in addition to the authors who publish in the journal, must observe the guidelines on (Sex and Gender Equity in Research SAGER). The SAGER guidelines comprise a set of guidelines that guide reporting of information about sex and gender in study design, data analysis, and results and interpretation of findings. In addition, Encontros Bibli observes the policy of gender equity in the formation of its editorial board.
Ethics Committee Based on Resolution nº 510, April 7, 2016, defining the regulations applicable to research in Human and Social Sciences. All manuscripts with the selection of participants and data collection involving human beings must be accompanied by a copy of the approval of the Research Ethics Committee
Copyright and Intellectual Property and Terms of Use According to the recommendations of the Open Access movement, this journal offers its content in Full Open Access. Thus, all authors have their rights preserved, allowing Encontros Bibli to publish their articles and disseminate them to the entire community. The content of Encontros Bibli is licensed by a Creative Commons 4.0 License CC BY.
Any user is entitled to:
According to the following terms: Assignment – The author must assign the proper credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate whether changes have been made. It must be done in any reasonable circumstance but without suggesting that the licensor should support the author or the license use. No extra restrictions – Legal terms or measures of technological nature that legally restrict others from any action allowed by the license are not permitted.
Sponsors and Promotion Agencies
|
Editor-in-Chief/Editor Manager
|
Editors Section
|
Scientific Editorial Board
|
Copy editors
|
Layout reviewers and proofreaders
|
Catalogs
|
Editor-in-Chief/Editor Manager
|
Duties and Tasks The editor-in-chief (or editor manager) is responsible for configuring and organizing the issues and publications, choosing the editorial team – emphasizing the exogeny of editors and reviewers –, editorial policies, content quality, and indexing on databases and directories of scientific journals. In addition to editing emails, forms, ethical and editorial guidelines, as well as all other information and decisions concerning the journal and the articles. Either the editor-in-chief or the assistant editor can register editors, evaluators, authors, and other users in the journal system. The assistant editor makes the editorial decisions along with the editor-in-chief to ensure the quality of the journal. In the absence of the editor-in-chief, the assistant editor is then responsible for such assignments. The assistant editor must have full knowledge of all editing steps, providing the editor-in-chief and the editorial committee with the information required for decision-making. The editor-in-chief conducts the first reading of the article concerning the journal's scope and scientific rigor, followed by the assistant editor. Subsequently, the article is referred to the editor of the section for a second evaluation and selection of reviewers. Approved manuscripts return to the editor-in-chief and assistant editor for text editing, trial composition, final publication, DOI attribution, and indexing. |
Section editors
|
Duties and tasks The section editor is responsible for the preliminary evaluation of articles in their specific assigned areas, defining whether they will be referred to or not to the double-blind review process. The evaluation must be based on scientific criteria, emphasizing an endogeny level close to zero. Next, the section editor indicates and/or suggests the referees and monitors the articles throughout the editorial process until their approval or rejection. The editors must observe the schedule established for the scientific referral, authors’ review, and final decision, guaranteeing that the deadlines are met. If necessary, the deadlines should be extended upon agreement by the editor-in-chief. The processes of preliminary manuscript reading, and selection of reviewers must not exceed seven days since the journal is committed to guaranteeing expedited processing to the authors. All manuscripts are tracked throughout the editorial process by the section editor, who impartially makes the editorial recommendations to the editor-in-chief based on the reviewers’ decisions. The editor-in-chief is responsible for the final editorial decision. The section editor must guarantee that the process is part of a double-blind review system, which means verifying whether the authors and evaluators send their decisions or manuscripts without property identification. In this case, the editor must remove the properties from the file. |
Section editor's choice of reviewer
|
The section editor must invite at least 4 (four) reviewers per submission, and at least 2 (two) of them must accept to participate in the manuscript evaluation. The evaluator’s (reviewer) choice must be based on the reviewer’s expertise on the manuscript content, preferably not belonging to the same institution as the authors and without having published with the group of authors in the last five years. The decisions will return with one of the following recommendations:
The editor-in-chief or assistant editor must be called for a joint decision if the article is either accepted or rejected. Subsequently, the accepted manuscript returns to the editor-in-chief or assistant editor for text editing, trial composition, and final publication. |
Editorial Board
|
Duties and tasks The members of the Editorial Council have an advisory role and might be called for decisions on manuscripts submitted for publication, as well as to act as a consultant in cases of doubts about ethical issues or diverging decisions by evaluators, controversial cases, issues of conflicts of interest, or other matters related to ethical and editorial policies. All recommendations by the Editorial Council must be grounded on the ethical guidelines defined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the editorial and ethical policies of the PAG, the good practices of scientific publication, and the recommendations of the indexers of both the Journal and the Brazilian Association of Scientific Editors (ABEC). In cases where a member of the Council is aware of the author’s identity, their recommendations must be made impartially. |
Editorial Support
|
Duties and tasks The editorial support team supports the tasks of configuration and layout, submission, verification of checklists, text editing, and proofreading, among other editorial tasks. |
Editorial Workflow
|
Submission: Other submissions are assigned to the section editors and considered for the step of review.
Review: The manuscripts are considered ready to be referred by the section editor for peer review. Text editing: The accepted articles are now improved by a text reviewer and the authors can review the text. Publication: Once the copies are finished and approved, the submission moves to the publication phase. During the production, the copied files are trial-converted – HTML, XML, PDF, etc., and the author can review the trials once more. Upon the approval of all authors, the submission is scheduled for publication. |
GENERAL ASPECTS
|
Encontros Bibli publishes research in the field of Information Science – LibraryScience, Documenting, Archival Science, Museology and Information Management, and related areas – produced based on scientific research, theoretical essays, and case studies. Research must be original and unpublished and contribute to the scientific community. Encontros Bibli does not accept submissions of literature reviews, scientific production analyses, or user studies. Only research that contributes to science development will be accepted. We do not accept articles that had been fully presented at scientific events. Only those papers not presented in full, such as "short papers" or abstracts, will be accepted whenever the research has been reworked, expanded, and significantly changed since this new text is then considered unpublished, thus being suitable for acceptance for evaluation. In this case, the authors must specify to the journal the event where the previous version was presented during the submission process. In the cases of articles derived from monographs, the authors must inform which PPG and board the work was presented. Research submitted to Encontros Bibli must not be and/or have been submitted to any other journal throughout the editorial process.
The texts can be presented in Portuguese, Spanish, English, or French. All works published in the journal Encontros Bibli will have a DOI. Aligned with the Open Science movement, our journal supports the use of preprint servers and accepts manuscripts previously stored on reliable servers, such as SciELO Preprints. We support the use of storage repositories for data conservation, dissemination, and reuse, such as SciELO Data. In both cases, the journal must be informed on the storage of preprint and/or data in the repository during the submission process. |
ABOUT THE SUBMISSION
|
All manuscripts must be submitted on the journal platform: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/submission/wizard. All documents created on Microsoft Word must have the author’s identification removed from their properties, Learn how to do it here. If the publication derives from a thesis or dissertation, had been published on any preprint platform, or is part of the results of a research project, the authors must inform it on the Work Notes document, in addition to declaring:
Upon submission, the following documents must be referred to:
1. Work Notes (Template).1.where the authors highlighted other information about the work such as:
2. Declaration of Translation Certificate (if any). The manuscript must fit the models provided by the journal, according to the categories below:
For the data article modality, all data or datasets referred to or provided must be raw, primary, or unprocessed data described in tables, charts, or figures in the article. It is worth highlighting that data articles must not include, by no means, interpretations, backgrounds, or conclusions. |
AUTHORSHIP
|
Authorship is indicated in scientific articles according to the Guidelines for authors by the COPE (English) and must refer only to those who:
1. intellectually, directly, and substantially contribute to the research/article design (acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of the data presented).
Name Middle Name Last Name The authorship credit must be based on substantial contributions, such as (a) design and manuscript elaboration, (b) data collection and analysis, (c) discussion of results, and (d) review and final approval of the article. If the authors’ contributions do not meet these criteria, they will be mentioned in the acknowledgments in the Work Notes document. The contribution of each author to the academic production must be described according to the CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) as follows: first names initials and last names. Example:
Design and elaboration of the manuscript: L. S. Last name, J. T. Last name, A. P. Last name Encontros Bibli Journal will not publish more than 1 (one) article by the same author yearly (volume) to avoid endogeny. |
METADATA IN THE SUBMISSION SYSTEM
All authors must have and inform the number of the ORCID register, which is free and available at https://orcid.org/. We strongly recommend that all authors and coauthors have updated curricula on the Lattes Platform for the submission of articles. Foreign authors must send the platform link with the curriculum.
Objective
|
EVALUATION PROCESS
|
Authors and referees can choose whether to be identified by names at the start of the peer evaluation process. Authors and evaluators can authorize the publicity of their names on the submission of the article and in the Evaluation Form, respectively.
Submission acceptance The manuscripts are pre-evaluated by the editors considering their originality, contribution, pertinence, thematic validity, general structure, and compliance with editorial policies. In case such criteria are not met, the authors will be informed within 15 days of the rejection and termination of the article. Upon a positive evaluation, the approved manuscript will be referred to two external referees who will be responsible for the analysis, approval (with or without changes), or rejection of the text within 30 days. If needed, the editors might request the participation of other evaluators. The editor responsible for the manuscript evaluation process will inform the author on the “Acceptance without changes,” “Acceptance with small adjustments,” “Required corrections” (and another referees’ analysis round), or “Rejection.” The evaluation decisions are sent in any of these cases. In the cases of “Acceptance with small adjustments” or “Required corrections,” the author must send the reviewed manuscript to Encontros Bibli within 30 (thirty) days, along with a document describing the changes and evaluators’ recommendations (accepted or not, plus justification). The editor responsible for the manuscript evaluation process will send the reviewed text to the referees, who will check whether the updated version of the text met the requirements and inform whether the text is to be accepted, rejected, or still require some changes. If the manuscript is “rejected” after the final evaluation, the author will be informed, and the submission will be terminated. If the text requires only grammar, spelling, and normative changes for publication homogeneity, the editors are entitled to perform such changes, respecting the author’s style. In other cases, the author will redraw the text according to the requests of the journal. All changes suggested by the text editors are referred to the authors for approval, who will have five days to either accept the suggestions and/or propose other changes. It is only upon the author’s approval of the final text version that the manuscript is sent to the editing process. The editors are entitled to reject works whose content is significantly like other works in any part of the process (plagiarism). The accepted manuscripts will be returned to the authors for the approval of changes throughout the editing process and journal style standardization. The author’s response must be delivered within five days. The decisions issued by the evaluators will be published with the manuscript. The evaluators receive a declaration on the manuscript decision and can validate the activity on the Publons or Reviewer Credit. |
MANUSCRIPT PREPARATION
|
A Revista Encontros Bibli disponibiliza o seguinte template para: The manuscript must be written according to the grammar rules of the original research language. The text body should preferably cover the following structure: introduction, literature review, methodological procedures or methodology, results, analysis, conclusions, references, and annexes (if any). The manuscript must be written in A4 format, single column, with at least 12 and up to 25 pages, including the references. The page layout must not be changed. Foreign words must be highlighted in italic. Margins must be 3cm – 2cm. The article title must be concise, avoiding excess words, either in Portuguese or English, written in Arial black font, 16, black color, bold upper-case letters. The title and subtitle (if any) must be separated by a colon (:). Title: Arial black font, 16, black color, left-aligned without hyphenation. The title in English must be written in bold, size 10. Line spacing in the text body must be 1.5, without spacing between paragraphs, with 1.25cm indentation at the beginning of each paragraph. The font in the text body must be Arial, 12, with justified alignment. Text, footnotes, titles, and other elements must be standardized using the Word style resource. All footnotes will only be used to indicate the source (authorship) and content of figures, tables, and captions, Arial font, 11. The format of the files must be Doc, Docx, Open Office, or RTF.
1. Full title in Portuguese: must be concise and avoid unnecessary and/or redundant words, without abbreviations.
5. The abstract in English must be compatible with the text of the abstract in Portuguese, following the same regulations and with corresponding keywords.
1. Introduction: Justifies the validity of the study objective. Readers should have the information required to understand both the objective and the relevance of the study (VOLPATO, 2007). Obs.: If the research collected data involving human beings, the methodological section must mention the approval by the Research Ethics Committee and annex the respective document to the manuscript.
1. Results: Brief and objective description of the results according to a logical sequence including text, figures, and tables. The results must emphasize the evidence required to answer the research questions or hypotheses investigated. |
QUOTATIONS AND REFERENCES
All quotations must follow the regulations of the Brazilian Association of Technical Regulations – ABNT, according to the author/date system in the NBR 10520/2002. Short direct quotations (literal) occupy up to 3 (three) lines and must be in quotes along the text body and must not be highlighted in italics (or any other highlight), followed by the authorship in brackets (author’s LAST NAME, year, page (with space between the period and page number). Example: “A scientific article is part of a publication with declared authorship presenting and discussing ideas, methods, techniques, processes, and results in several knowledge areas.” (ABNT, 2003, p. 2). Along the text body, the author must be identified as follows: According to Barros and Lehfeld (2000, p. 107), “quotations or transcriptions of bibliographic documents should strengthen and support the researcher’s thesis or document their interpretation”. Long direct quotations (literal) occupy more than 3 (three) lines and must be on a highlighted paragraph, with 4cm of left indentation, justified alignment, single line spacing, with before and after spacing, Arial font 11, without quotation marks, no italic (or any outro highlight), followed by the authorship in brackets: (author’s LAST NAME, year, page with space between the period and the number), with the period after the brackets. Example: Language, thereby, is no longer a place where individuals meet; it also imposes such an encounter well-defined form. It is no longer only a condition of social life but a form of social life. It loses its innocence. Language, therefore, will be no longer defined, à la Saussure’s mode, as a code, that is, as a communication instrument. It will be though regarded as a game, or better, as the establishing of rules of a game, and a game that is confused with daily existence (DUCROT, 1977, p. 12). In turn, an indirect quotation is a paraphrase elaborated based on an author’s idea or opinion in a consulted work. In this case, only the author’s last name is indicated, along with the year of work publication written using the same font as in the text body (Arial font, 12). The page number does not need to be indicated. Examples: (a) The text body must include only the first letter of the author’s last name in upper-case, with the year indicated in brackets, and without the page number. - In Souza and Faria’s opinion (2000) [...]. - Likewise, Lopes (2008) [...]. (b) At the end of the quote: author’s last name in uppercase letters. ... (SOUZA; FARIA, 2000). ... (LOPES, 2008).
All references must follow the regulations of the Brazilian Association of Technical Regulations – ABNT, as established in the NBR 6023/2018, and organized in alphabetical order. References with more than one author must mention all authors who participated in the manuscript; the use of (et al.) will not be accepted. We strongly recommend that over 60% of the references have been published in the past five years. The DOI to the publications should be indicated whenever it is available. The manuscript will be published only upon properly describing all data and materials according to our guidelines for authors. Examples:
BAUMAN, Zygmunt. Globalização: as consequências humanas. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar, 1999. ROMANO, Giovanni. Imagens da juventude na era moderna. In: LEVI, G.; SCHMIDT, J. (org.). História dos jovens 2: a época contemporânea. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 1996. p. 7-16.
BAVARESCO, Agemir; BARBOSA, Evandro; ETCHEVERRY, Katia Martin (org.). Projetos de filosofia. Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS, 2011. E-book. Disponível em: http://ebooks.pucrs.br/edipucrs/projetosdefilosofia.pdf. Acesso em: 21 ago. 2011. OLIVEIRA, H. P. C. DE; VIDOTTI, S. A. B. G.; BENTES, V. Arquitetura da informação. In: OLIVEIRA, H. P. C. DE; VIDOTTI, S. A. B. G.; BENTES, V.. Arquitetura da informação pervasiva. São Paulo: UNESP; São Paulo: Cultura Acadêmica, 2015. p. 43-74. Disponível em: http://static.scielo.org/scielobooks/6cn9c/pdf/oliveira-9788579836671.pdf. Acesso em: 13 ago 2020.
AGUIAR, André Andrade de. Avaliação da microbiota bucal em pacientes sob uso crônico de penicilina e benzatina. 2009. Tese (Doutorado em Cardiologia) – Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2009. NASCIMENTO, Mateus Rebouças. Indicadores de produção intelectual na Ciência da Informação: perspectivas para o Sistema de Avaliação da Capes. 2022. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciência da Informação) – Centro de Ciências da Educação, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciência da Informação, Florianópolis, 2022. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufsc.br/handle/123456789/234795. Acesso em: 28 maio 2022.
BENNETTON, M. J. Terapia ocupacional e reabilitação psicossocial: uma relação pos sível. Revista de Terapia Ocupacional da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, v. 4, n. 3, p. 11-16, mar. 1993. DIAS, Karcia Lúcia Oliveira; OLIVEIRA, Maria Juvenal Freire de; ALBUQUERQUE, Baltar Carneiro de. Da Xilogravura na matriz à digital. Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação, [S. l.], v. 27, n. 1, p. 1–21, 2022. DOI: 10.5007/1518-2924.2022.e87170. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/87170. Acesso em: 7 dez. 2022.
INGIZZA, Carolina; ANGRELA, Lucas; GUILHERME, Guilherme. O fantástico mercado dos games. Revista Exame, São Paulo, 13 ago. 2020. Disponível em: https://exame.com/revista-exame/o-fantastico-mercado-dos-games/. Acesso em: 22 ago. 2020. PETRY, André. Certezas sem base. Veja, São Paulo, ed. 2416, ano 48, nº 10, p.58-59, 11 mar. 2015
ONDA de frio: reviravolta traz vento e forte chance de neve. Zero Hora, Porto Alegre, ano 47, n. 16.414, p. 2, 12 ago. 2010. AMENDOLA, Gilberto. OMS inclui uma síndrome de burnout na lista de doenças. Estadão, São Paulo, 28 mai. 2019. Disponível em: https://saude.estadao.com.br/noticias/geral,oms-inclui-a-sindrome-de-burnout-na-lista-de-doencas,70002845142. Acesso em: 22 ago. 2020.
Jan Velterop; Erik Schultes. An Academic Publishers’ GO FAIR Implementation Network (APIN). SciELO Data, V1, 2021. https://doi.org/10.48331/scielodata.9CT6WT. PEREIRA, Eduardo. Analise de co-citação em redes sociais do Brasil., OSF [dataset] versão dez. 2021. https://doi.org/10.5281/0123-45620227707. PEREIRA, EANES; BARROS FILHO, MAURO; SIMOES, MATHEUS; BEZERRA NETO, JOSÉ AUGUSTO. Data for: Automatic Detection of Deprived Urban Areas Using Google Earth™ Images of Cities from the Brazilian Semi-arid Region. SciELO Data, V1, 2022. https://doi.org/10.48331/scielodata.MAEYDV.
SIMPÓSIO INTERNACIONAL SOBRE A JUVENTUDE BRASILEIRA, 4., 2010. Belo Horizonte, MG. Anais [...]. Belo Horizonte: PUC Minas, 2011. CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE UNIDADES DE CONSERVAÇÃO, 4., 2004, Curitiba. Anais [...]. Curitiba: Fundação Boticário de Proteção à Natureza, 2004. 224 p. OYADOMARI, A. T. et al. Efeitos da terapia por laser de baixa potência no processo de reparo de defeitos ósseos preenchidos pelo osso bovino Bio-Oss® associados ao novo selante heterólogo de fibrina. In: SIMPÓSIO INTERNACIONAL DE INICIAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA DA UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO, 25., 2017, Bauru. Resumos [...]. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo, 2017.
ALMEIDA, M. T. et al. Avaliação do professor realizada pelo aluno: impacto nas práticas docentes: impacto nas práticas docentes. Rev. Bras. Educ. Méd., Rio de Janeiro, v. 35, n. 4, p. 141-142, set./dez. 2011. supl. 1. Trabalho apresentado no 49° Congresso Brasileiro de Educação Médica, Belo Horizonte, 2011. AZENHA, F. S. P; FERRARI, D. V.. Acceptable noise level (ANL): results with different stimuli. J Appl Oral Sci, Bauru, v. 24, p. 219, 2016. Special Issue. Trabalho apresentado no 23° Congresso Fonoaudiológico de Bauru “Profa. Dra. Adréa Cintra Lopes, Bauru, 2016.
SEMINÁRIO INTERNACIONAL DE HISTÓRIA DA LITERATURA, 6., 2005, Porto Alegre. Anais [...]. Cadernos do Centro de Pesquisas Literárias da PUCRS. Porto Alegre: Ed. PUCRS, v. 12, n. 1, 2006. SEMINÁRIO INTERNACIONAL DE HISTÓRIA DA LITERATURA, 6., 2005, Porto Alegre. Anais [...]. Cadernos do Centro de Pesquisas Literárias da PUCRS. Porto Alegre: Ed. PUCRS, v. 12, n. 1, 2006. Tema: Literatura: memória e história. CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE OLERICULTURA, 41.; ENCONTRO SOBRE PLANTAS MEDICINAIS, AROMÁTICAS E CONDIMENTARES, 1., 2001, Brasília, DF. Apresentação, artigos, palestras, instruções.... Horticultura Brasileira. Brasília, DF: Sociedade de Olericultura do Brasil, v. 19, n. 2, jul. 2001. Suplemento. Tema: Dos orgânicos aos transgênicos.
ABNT - Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas. ABNT NBR ISO 12836: odontologia: dispositivos para sistemas CAD/CAM para restaurações dentárias indiretas: métodos de ensaio para avaliação de exatidão. Rio de Janeiro: ABNT, 2017. 14 p. ABNT - Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas. ABNT NBR 9050: Acessibilidade a edificações, mobiliário, espaços e equipamentos urbanos. Rio de Janeiro: ABNT, 2004. 97 p.
LEHNEN, Romeu. Salto com mecanismo amortecedor. Depositante: Custódio de Almeida & Cia. MU 8803472-0 Y1. Depósito: 09 set. 2008. Concessão: 21 maio 2019. GALEMBECK, Fernando; SOUZA, Maria de Fátima Brito. Process to obtain an Intercalated or exfoliated polyester with clay hybrid nanocomposite material. Depositante: Universidade Estadual de Campinas; Rhodia Ster S/A. WO2005/030850 A1, Depósito: 1 Oct. 2003, Concessão: 7 Apr. 2005. Disponível em: http://www.iprvillage.Info/portal/servlet/DIIDirect?CC=WO&PN=2005030850&DT=A1&SrcAut. Acesso em: 27 ago. 2010.
MINAS GERAIS. Lei n.869, de 5 de julho de 1952. Dispõe sobre o estatuto dos funcionários públicos civis do Estado de Minas Gerais. Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 6 jul. 1952. BRASIL. Decreto n. 1.799, de 30 de janeiro de 1996. Regulamenta a Lei n. 5.433, de 8 de maio de 1968, que regula a Microfilmagem de documentos oficiais, e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial, Brasília, DF, 31 jan. 1996. BRASIL. Lei nº 7.766, de 11 de maio de 1989. Dispõe sobre o ouro, ativo financeiro, e sobre seu tratamento tributário. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/LEIS/L7766.htm. Acesso em: 22 ago. 2020.
BRASIL. Superior Tribunal de Justiça. Súmula n° 333. Cabe mandado de segurança contra ato praticado em licitação promovida por sociedade de economia mista ou empresa pública. Brasília, DF: Superior Tribunal de Justiça, [2007]. Disponível em: http://www.stj.jus.br/SCON/sumanot/toc.jsp?&b=TEMA&p=true&t =&l=10&i=340#TIT333TEMA0. Acesso em: 24 ago 2020.
CONSELHO ESTADUAL DE SAÚDE (Rio de Janeiro). Deliberação nº 05/CES/SES, de 6 de junho de 1997. Aprova o Regimento Interno do Conselho Estadual de Saúde. Diário Oficial [do] Estado do Rio de Janeiro: parte 1: Poder Executivo, Niterói, ano 23, n. 139, p. 29-31, 30 jul. 1997. BRASIL. Ministério da Educação. Ofício circular 017/MEC. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Educação, 26 jan. 2006. Assunto: FUNDEB. Disponível em: http://portal.mec.gov.br/seb/arquivos/pdf/Fundebef/ofsmeincl.pdf. Acesso em: 26 ago. 2020.
BRASIL. Constituição (1988). Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República, [2016]. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicaocompilado.htm. Acesso em: 25 ago. 2020. RIO GRANDE DO SUL. [Constituição (1989)]. Constituição do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul. 4. ed. atual. Porto Alegre: Assembleia Legislativa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, 1995. PARAÍBA. [Constituição (1989)]. Constituição do Estado da Paraíba. Organizado por Francisco Carneiro. João Pessoa: Assembleia Legislativa do Estado da Paraíba, [2015]. Disponível em: http://www.al.pb.leg.br/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Constitui%C3%A7%C3%A3o-Esta dual-Atualizada-at%C3%A9-a-Emenda-40-de-2015.pdf. Acesso em: 29 out. 2020. BRASIL. [Constituição (1988)]. Emenda constitucional nº 9, de 9 de novembro de 1995. Dá nova redação ao art. 177 da Constituição Federal, alterando e inserindo parágrafos. Lex: legislação federal e marginalia, São Paulo, v. 59, p. 1966, out./dez. 1995
CAPES - Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior. Plataforma Sucupira. Brasília, DF: CAPES, c2016. Disponível em: https://sucupira.capes.gov.br/sucupira/public/index.xhtml. Acesso em: 29 out. 2020. LAYUB. Via Carreira. Página Inicial. [S.l.]. LAYUB, c2020. Disponível em: https://viacarreira.com/. Acesso em: 29 out. 2020
BIREME - Centro Latino-Americano e do Caribe de Informação em Ciências da Saúde. LILACS. São Paulo: BIREME, 2019. Base de dados. Disponível em: http://lilacs.bvsalud.org. Acesso em: 29 out. 2020. COCHRANE. Cochrane Library. St Albans House: Wiley, c2019. Disponível em: https://www. cochranelibrary.com. Acesso em: 6 fev. 2019. Base de dados.
PACKER, A. L. et al. SciELO pós 20 anos: o futuro continua aberto.In: SCIELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online. SciELO em Perspectiva. São Paulo, 19 dez. 2018. Disponível em: https://blog.scielo.org/blog/2018/12/19/scielo-pos-20-anos-o-futuro-continua-aberto/#.XDYD31xKiUk. Acesso em: 9 jan. 2019. SCIELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online. Preprints são um problema? Cinco formas de melhorar a qualidade e credibilidade dos preprints. In: SCIELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online. SciELO em Perspectiva. São Paulo, 15 out. 2020. Disponível em: https://blog.scielo.org/blog/2020/10/15/preprints-sao-um-problema-cinco-formas-de-melhorar-a-qualidade-e-credibilidade-dos-preprints/#.X5rMoFNKjfZ. Acesso em: 29 out. 2020.
OLIVEIRA, José P. M. Repositório digital da UFRGS é destaque em ranking internacional. Maceió, 19 ago. 2011. Twitter: @biblioufal. Disponível em: http://twitter.com/#!/biblioufal. Acesso em: 20 ago. 2011. MENA-CHALCO, J. As práticas de publicação estão condicionadas pelas políticas de avaliação? [...]. São Paulo, 31 out. 2018. Twitter: @jmenac. Disponível em: https://twitter.com/ jmenac/status/1057660006634536961. Acesso em: 6 jan. 2019. NASA - NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION. Twas the night before launch! The U.S. will soon have two of the most advanced weather satellites ever, operating in tandem. [...]. [S.l.]. 1 mar. 2018. Instagram: @nasa. Disponível em: https://www.instagram.com/p/Bfw_zcynDfl/?taken-by=nasa. Acesso em: 29 out. 2020.
SIBi – Sistema Integrado de Bibliotecas. Portal de Revistas da USP tem novo design. Destinatário: Rede de bibliotecas do SIBi.. São Paulo: 18 mar. 2020. 1 mensagem eletrônica. NEVES, Bianca. Relatório de desempenho. Destinatário: Nila Maria. São Paulo: 18 mar. 2020. 1 mensagem eletrônica.
FERREIRA, Paulo. [Correspondência]. Destinatário: José Clóvis Ferreira. Ribeirão Preto, 6 jun. 1996. 1 carta. LISPECTOR, Clarice. [Carta enviada para suas irmãs]. Destinatário: Elisa e Tânia Lispector. Lisboa, 4 ago. 1944. 1 carta. Disponível em: http://www.claricelispector.com.br/manuscrito_minhasqueridas.aspx. Acesso em: 4 set. 2010.
GORB: Gerador Online de Referências Bibliográficas. versão 1.0 Marília: LAYUB, 2020. 1 software de internet. Disponível em: http:/gorb.viacarreira.com. Acesso em: 29 out. 2020. GRAND Theft Auto: San Andreas. 5nd. Edimburgo: Rockstar North, 2004. 1 jogo eletrônico. SPOTIFY. Versão 1.1.31.703. Estocolmo: Spotify AB, 2020. 1 aplicativo de streaming.
SASSE, Arthur. Einstein mostrando a língua. 1951. 1 fotografia. FRANK, Chris. Big and Bigger. 2017. 1 fotografia. 1024 × 683 pixels. Disponível em: https://www.flickr.com/photos/chrisnaton/34880385211/. Acesso em: 8 ago. 2020. STRUCK, Mathieu. Carnaval de Curitiba. 22 mar. 2020. 1 fotografia . Disponível em: https://www.instagram.com/p/B84-YG0lw4Q/. Acesso em: 30 out. 2020.
CENTRAL do Brasil. Direção: Walter Salles Júnior. Produção: Martire de ClermontTonnerre e Arthur Cohn. Intérpretes: Fernanda Montenegro, Marilia Pera, Vinicius de Oliveira, Sônia Lira, Othon Bastos, Matheus Nachtergaele et al. Roteiro: Marcos Bernstein, João Emanuel Carneiro e Walter Salles Júnior. [S. l.]: Le Studio Canal; Riofilme; MACT Productions, 1998. 5 rolos de filme (106 min), son., color., 35 mm.
LOST (Temporada 1, ep. 5). Criadores: Jeffrey Lieber; J. J. Abrams; Damon Lindelof. Produtores: Sarah Caplan et al. Hawaii: Produtora ABC Network, 2004. 1 DVD (45 min.), son., color. HOUSE of cards (primeira temporada). Criação Beau Willimon. Produtores: David Fincher; Kevin Spacey; Eric Roth. S.l.: Media Rights Capital; Panic Pictures, 2013. 13 episódios, son., col. Série exibida pela Netflix. Acesso em: 24 jul. 2019.
UM MANIFESTO 2.0 do bibliotecário. Mash up por Laura Cohen. Tradução: Maria José Vicentini Jorente. [S. l.: s. n.], 2007. 1 vídeo (4 min). Disponível em: http://www.youtube.com/watch?vYj1p0A8DMrE. Acesso em: 12 maio 2010. O QUE É PLÁGIO acadêmico e quais são suas consequências. Produção: Gabriel José. Reportagem: Gabriel José, Ludmilla Cabral. [S.l.]: TV UFMG, 2018. Publicado pelo canal TV UFMG em 11 abr. 2018. Disponível em: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jj9elw6MSw0. Acesso em: 29 out. 2020.
EPISÓDIO 2: O Julgamento. [Locução de]: Branca Vianna. Entrevistados: Jacqueline Pitanguy; Hildete Pereira de Melo; Artur Xexéo et al. Rio de Janeiro: Rádio Novelo, 19 set. 2020. Podcast. (Série Praia dos Ossos). Disponível em: https://www.radionovelo.com.br/praiadosossos/. Acesso em: 29 out. 2020. DRAGÕES de garagem #137: vó Maria: vacinas e escolhas #semanadavacina. [Locução de]: Barbara Paes. [S.l.]: Dragões de Garagem, 14 ago. 2018. Podcast. Disponívem em: http:// dragoesdegaragem.com/podcast/dragoes-de-garagem-137-vo-maria-vacinas-e-escolhassemanadavacina/. Acesso em: 9 jan. 2019.
GOMES, Laurentino. 1822. Na voz de Pedro Bial. [S. l.]: Plugme, 2011. 1 audiolivro (CD-ROM). BAUM, L. F. The wonderful land of Oz. Ledor: Roy Trumbull. [S. l.]: Project Gutenberg, 2005. 1 audiolivro (CD-ROM), extensão MP3 (4 MB). LOBATO, Monteiro. Narizinho Arrebitado. Na voz de Paola Molinari, Clayton Heringer, Juscelino Filho. [S.l.]: Tocalivros Studios, 2020. 1 audiolivro (online). Disponível em: https://www.tocalivros.com/audiolivro/narizinho-arrebitado-monteiro-lobato-paola-molinari-clayton-heringer-j-tocalivros-studios. Acesso em: 30 out. 2020.
PROCISSÃO. Intérprete: Gilberto Gil. Compositor: Gilberto Gil. In: EM CONCERTO. Intérprete: Gilberto Gil. Rio de Janeiro: Geleia Geral, 1987. 1 disco vinil, lado A, faixa 2, (2m). TE ENSINEI certin. Intérprete: Ludmilla. Compositores: Umberto Tavares Oliveira e Jefferson Júnior. In: HELLO Mundo (Ao vivo). Intérprete: Ludmilla. Rio de Janeiro: Warner Music, 2019. Streaming de música Spotify, faixa 2 (4 min). Disponível em: https://open.spotify.com/album/3VDQ3Oa1bICtnbII8HowVw. Acesso em: 31 out. 2020. THE NINE symphonies. Compositor: Ludwig van Beethoven. Orquestra: Wiener Philharmoniker. Regente: Leonard Bernstein. Soprano: Gwyneth Jones. Contralto: Hanna Schwarz. Tenor: René Kollo. Baixo: Kurt Moll. Coro: Konzertvereinigung Wiener Staatsopernchor. Hamburg: Deutsche Gramophon, 1980. 5 CD |
DATA STORAGE POLICY
|
Data are scientific records that validate research results. Research data vary according to the knowledge area and encompass textual documents, spreadsheets, statistics, laboratory reports, field reports, journals, questionnaires, transcriptions, audio and video files, photographs, methodologies, research workflows, partial reports, and other materials elaborated and/or collected throughout the research. All data are supported by the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) principles. Encontros Bibli Journal instructs that all research data and codes are shared and published on a reliable repository. Therefore, we strongly recommended that all data be stored on SciELO Data upon the approval of the manuscripts based on the Guidelines for research data storage. In case the data are hosted in a public repository, it must be indicated on the article by the repository name, data identification number, direct URL to the data, and DOI. |
PRIVACY POLICY
| All names and addresses informed to this journal will be used exclusively for the services rendered in the scope of this publication and cannot be provided for any other purposes or third parties, according to LAW Nº 13.709, AUGUST 14, 2018, General Data Protection LAW – LGPD, Articles 3 and 23. |
COPYRIGHTS
|
According to the recommendations of the Open Access movement, this journal offers its content in Full Open Access. Thus, all authors have their rights preserved, allowing Encontros Bibli to publish their articles and disseminate them to the entire community. The content of Encontros Bibli is licensed by a Creative Commons 4.0 License CC BY.
Any user is entitled to:
According to the following terms: Assignment – The author must assign the proper credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate whether changes have been made. It must be done in any reasonable circumstance but without suggesting that the licensor should support the author or the license use. No extra restrictions – Legal terms or measures of technological nature that legally restrict others from any action allowed by the license are not permitted. |
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
|
Conflicts of interest can be personal, commercial, policy, academic, or financial and emerge when authors, reviewers, or editors have interests that might influence the elaboration or evaluation of manuscripts.
|
PLAGIARISM
|
Our editorial practice and the relationship between editors and authors and evaluators follow the Guidelines for editors defined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). All forms of plagiarism are unethical publication behavior, which is unacceptable. Encontros Bibli Journal has zero tolerance for cases involving plagiarism; therefore, all submitted manuscripts are subjected to a process of identification of plagiarism and self-plagiarism after the peer review process through the Ithenticate tool for detecting the similarity of characters. Plagiarism detected in manuscripts throughout the evaluation process will imply submission termination. In the case of plagiarism detection in a manuscript published in the journal, the editor-in-chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if needed, recant. |
PUBLICATION
|
Encontros Bibli Journal publicizes its publications on YouTube, Instagram, and Facebook, and recommends the authors disseminate their articles on their personal and institutional social networks |
